Deployment of
overseas Filipino workers abroad, even in danger zones, has been the
response of the government to the ballooning unemployment rate and
worsening poverty situation. But despite their valuable contribution
in propping up the ailing economy, the “modern-day heroes” do not get
what is due to them. In times of crisis, they are left to fend for
themselves without the assistance of the government that reaps the
benefits of their labor.
Unable to achieve its target of creating one million jobs a year, the
Arroyo government is aggressively pushing its labor export policy.
As of Nov. 18, the country has deployed 991,461 overseas Filipino
workers (OFWs) across the globe. Of this, 751,974 are land-based
migrant workers while the remaining 239,487 are seafarers.
In 2005, the $10.7 billion of OFW remittances kept the economy afloat
by providing the much needed dollar reserves and financing consumer
expenditures of families of OFWs. In fact, the promotions and sales
campaigns of the housing sector are targeted at the families of OFWs.
This year, Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) projects remittances to
go as high as $13.4 billion. During the first ten months of 2006,
remittances had already reached $10.3 billion. BSP Deputy Governor
Diwa Gunigundo projects that OFW remittances for 2007 could surpass
the 2006 figures at $14.1 billion.
Despite the heaping praises from government, Connie Bragas-Regalado,
chair of Migrante International, said that OFWs do not receive the
services “modern-day heroes” deserve.
Worse, in spite of the government’s policy to “allow our citizens to
work only in safe places,” she said OFWs are still working in and are
being deployed to
danger zones
all over the world (SEE TABLE).
Escaping poverty
Being the poorest island
in the country,
Mindanao has the highest
deployment of women workers abroad
over the last three years, with Region 12 or Soccsksargen leading over
the island's six regions. The Center for Migrant Advocacy Philippines
(CMA-Philippines) revealed that four out of 10 OFWs come from
Mindanao. CMA also said that out of the 135,000 OFWs from the island
66.2 percent are women while only 34.8 percent are men. Confirming the
report, the National Statistical Coordination Board (NSCB) said that
in 2005 six out of 10 OFWs coming from Mindanao are women, compared to
only four out of ten in Luzon and Visayas.
Some local governments have come up with various schemes to facilitate
the deployment of OFWs. The Clark Development Corporation (CDC)
opened a One-Stop Processing Center (OSPC)
inside
the special economic zone. With the said scheme, the various
government agencies involved in the issuance of permits and licenses,
and the processing of the papers of OFWs are housed inside the Clark
Special Economic Zone (CSEZ).
In Barangay Culiat in Quezon City, a Muslim community called Salam has
become a
transit point
for several women from Mindanao who are hoping to be deployed to
Middle East countries. In Salam, Muslim agents help the women process
their requirements with recruitment and government agencies, and
provide free board and lodging. The cost incurred in the processing of
papers and the board and lodging are computed and deducted from the
salaries of OFWs once they start working abroad.
Risks
Ironically, OFWs who have escaped the war and poverty in Mindanao
found themselves in the crossfire in
war-torn countries.
The U.S. invasion of Iraq made it risky for OFWs to work in that
country, especially since most available jobs revolve around the war
and reconstruction activities of the U.S. armed forces. Three
Filipino truck drivers were killed and several others wounded in
different bombing incidents inside U.S. military camps or while
transporting supplies for U.S. troops. For a salary of around $2,000
to $4,000 a month, some Filipinos even accept mercenary jobs providing
security to U.S. troops, supply convoys, and strategic installations.
In Saudi Arabia, OFWs Abel Monterela and Felix Llorando, along with
three others, died in February after being wounded in a shootout
between Saudi police and militants.
Twenty Filipino seafarers were seized by Somali rebels who held them
hostage for 108 days last March 29.
Recently, more than 250 OFWs working at Betchel Oil Refinery in Tengiz,
Kazakhstan found themselves at risk after a riot between Turkish
workers and Kazakhs who accused migrant workers of taking over their
jobs. The OFWs have likewise received threats from the Kazakhs.
Despite the threats to their lives, many OFWs choose to stay in their
jobs rather than risk dying of hunger and poverty at home. Thus, OFW
deployment to these danger zones continues. (see table)
Lebanon
The crisis in Lebanon was a glaring example of the type of response
and services the Arroyo government provides to OFWs. It took ten
days, after Israel started bombing Lebanon last July 12, before the
Philippines was able to repatriate the first batch of OFWs. The
government cited the difficulties and obstacles created by the war as
the reason for the delays. But France was able to bring home its
nationals on the third day.
Quoting a “top level source” at the Overseas Workers Welfare
Administration (OWWA) who claims to have “first-hand knowledge”
regarding the evacuation plans for OFWs, Migrante Sectoral Party (MSP)
spokesperson Garry Martinez disclosed that the government
planned to repatriate only 10
percent or about 3,400 of the 34,000
OFWs in Lebanon. Martinez also said that the government has no crisis
management plan in case the war escalates in the region.
For their part, Migrante helped the distressed OFWs in Lebanon thru
Task Force Ligtas (Task Force Safety), which was formed much earlier
than the government’s Oplan Sagip OFW sa Lebanon (Oplan Save OFWs in
Lebanon). After Migrante announced the formation of the task force and
the hotline number on the third day of the bombing, they were flooded
by calls and text messages from families of stranded OFWs in Lebanon.
The evacuation efforts of the Arroyo government was even marred by
squabbles over funding involving officials from the Philippine embassy
in Lebanon, the Department of Foreign Affairs and the OWWA. The
bickering started when Ambassador to Lebanon Al Francis Bichara said
on national television that they would be constrained to stop the
evacuation of OFWs for lack of funds.
In a news briefing in Malacañang, Foreign Affairs Undersecretary for
Migrant Workers Affairs Esteban Conejos Jr., countered that the
Department of Budget and Management (DBM) released $150 million to the
Department of Foreign Affairs (DFA) on July 20. He further claimed
that of the said amount, $150,000 was disbursed to the Philippine
embassy in Lebanon to augment the latter’s funds which amounted to
only $200,000.
Martinez also learned through his caregiver wife in Kadima, Israel
that the government had no evacuation plan for OFWs in Israel in case
the war escalated. To cope with this, Migrante organized its own
safety and security plans, and spread it to OFWs through Martinez’s
wife.
Bragas-Regalado said that the Philippine government should have a
contingency plan in place since the Lebanon-Israel conflict is a
recurring situation.
It was even the International Organization for Migrants (IOM) which
shouldered the repatriation costs of more than 4,000 OFWs from among
the 6,000 migrant workers it repatriated.
Miserable life back home
The travails of OFWs from Lebanon did not end with their
repatriation. For days, the repatriated OFWs from Lebanon filled the
lobby of the OWWA center
waiting and begging
for the release of their plane ticket to their respective provinces.
They were also burdened by the fact that they had become jobless when
they had to pay the debts they incurred to be able to work in Lebanon
and their family had to survive.
The government promised the repatriated OFWs that they could avail of
trainings, livelihood support, scholarships and other forms of
assistance upon their return to their respective provinces. Somehow,
these promises provided a tinge of hope but the repatriated OFWs could
not wait forever to be able to avail of the promised assistance.
Thus, despite the trauma they experienced, most if not all are willing
to leave the country again for another job in order to uplift their
deplorable lives.
Meanwhile, President Arroyo, in her 2006 state of the nation address,
announced that one of the thrusts of her administration is the
upgrading of skills and knowledge of Filipino domestic helpers who are
planning to work abroad so that they could become what the president
described as “supermaids.”
She explained that the training of “supermaids” would increase the
value of OFWs who work as domestic workers abroad and eventually
compensate for the economic dislocation repatriated OFWs experienced.
Migrant leader Bragas-Regalado said that this move is not the answer
to the needs of the OFWs, in particular, and the Filipino people, in
general. She said this only shows that the government could not
provide the much-needed jobs locally. Thus, it had to rely on the
export of the country’s human resources to prop up the economy and
provide gainful employment to Filipinos. Bulatlat
OFWs Battle to Save
their Own Lives
(Conclusion)
|
Table
|
|
Country |
OFW Deployment |
|
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Total |
|
Iraq |
1,490 |
3,252 |
---- |
4,742 |
|
Afghanistan |
19 |
148 |
498 |
665 |
|
Table 2. 2003
OFW Deployment * |
|
|
Iraq |
Kuwait |
KSA |
Israel |
|
January |
|
2,196 |
20,173 |
493 |
|
February |
1 |
1,622 |
14,784 |
779 |
|
March |
|
1,168 |
12,581 |
251 |
|
April |
|
2,033 |
15,303 |
984 |
|
May |
2 |
1,852 |
17,141 |
591 |
|
June |
5 |
1,859 |
16,182 |
377 |
|
July |
|
2,770 |
13,152 |
282 |
|
August |
9 |
2,212 |
13,483 |
298 |
|
September |
187 |
3,559 |
14,578 |
425 |
|
October |
406 |
2,334 |
9,380 |
321 |
|
November |
172 |
1,868 |
11,906 |
177 |
|
December |
708 |
2,752 |
10,348 |
116 |
|
Total |
1,489 |
21,239 |
121,473 |
3,571 |
|
Source: Migrante’s record from DoLE
*
despite DoLE Order # 42-03, March 22, 2003:
Temporary suspension of deployment of overseas Filipino workers
to Iraq, Kuwait, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Israel |
|
Table 1. Jobs
created vs. OFW deployment
2001- 2006 |
|
|
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
|
Jobs Created ('000; as of April) |
859
|
1,026
|
232
|
1,115
|
688
|
803
|
|
OFWs Deployed |
867,599
|
891,908
|
867,969
|
933,588
|
988,383
|
564,920a
|
|
OFWs Remittances ($M) |
6,031.3
|
7,189.2
|
7,640.0
|
8,344.5
|
10,689.0
|
3,712.9b
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Source: Labor Force Survey-NSO; POEA; BSP
A – Jan to June
B – Jan to April |
|
Table 3
Danger Zones |
|
Country |
OFWs and OFs |
|
|
|
|
For POEA, DFA |
|
|
Iraq |
6,020* |
|
Lebanon |
34,437** |
|
Afghanistan |
370* |
|
|
|
|
Other countries considered
as danger zones by Migrante |
|
|
Somalia |
5* |
|
Saudi Arabia |
994,377** |
|
Nigeria |
12,354** |
|
North Korea |
4* |
|
South Korea |
47,150** |
|
Iran |
1,254* |
|
Israel |
37,155** |
|
Liberia |
175* |
|
Balkan Peninsula |
26,831* |
|
|
|
|
Total |
1,160,132 |
|
|
|
|
* DFA-OUMWA report as of Sept. 13, 2005
** Commission on Filipinos Overseas, 2004
- Balkan Peninsula (Croatia, Bosnia, Herzegovina, Yugoslavia,
Serbia, Montenegro, Albania, Greece, Bulgaria, plus Slovenia,
Romania, European part of Turkey, and Eastern Thrace) |
© 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Media Center |