| Albert Lopez hasn’t stopped missing his
mom. He was only six when she left the Philippines to work as a
caregiver in the desert kingdom of Bahrain. From there, she eventually
moved to Canada as a nanny under the Live-in Caregiver Program (LCP).
When she acquired immigrant status, she petitioned to bring the whole
family to Canada. When Albert met her again, he was already 12 years
old.
It’s a story that was supposed to have a storybook ending—the
family makes up for lost time and lives happily ever after—except that
this wasn’t the case.
“We [had] been separated for too long. It was difficult for us to
be close again,” Albert, now 22, told the Georgia Straight.
It didn’t help that although his mother no longer worked as a
nanny, she had to juggle low-paying jobs. Because of health problems,
his father stopped working a few years after arriving in Canada.
“She leaves the house at 5 a.m. She comes back at 4 p.m. She’s out
again by 5 p.m. and comes home at 1 a.m. There is no time for us to
build a relationship,” Albert said.
When Albert started to encounter problems in secondary school,
there was no one to turn to for support. He later dropped out of high
school.
His story isn’t an isolated one.
A study conducted by a UBC professor suggests that families that
have been separated and reunited under the LCP discover that their
much-anticipated reunion has simply opened up a new chapter of
separation.
Geography professor Geraldine Pratt said in an interview that LCP
reunification has become a “recipe for disaster”.
“It’s a stressful experience, with members of the family
experiencing migration at different stages and with different
expectations,” said Pratt, who has done previous studies on the LCP as
part of her research on labour migration.
Through family interviews and data from the B.C. Ministry of
Education, the study looked at the lives of the children, particularly
their educational and occupational success in Canada, because “so many
of the hopes of migration are tied to children’s education and future
well-being.”
Pratt tracked four groups of children who began secondary school in
Grade 8 in the Vancouver region in 1995, 1996, 1997, and 1998.
She compared those who speak Tagalog—the main Filipino language—at
home with a selection of other language groups, namely Punjabi,
Chinese, Vietnamese, and English. Although children who have been
separated from parents through the LCP cannot be identified in the
Education Ministry data, the “best ‘proxy’ that we have to identify
Filipino children of the LCP is language spoken at home”.
The results are troubling.
“Analyzing the educational achievements of children in the sample,
along with BC Ministry of Education data for children who speak
Tagalog at home, we conclude that these children are not faring as
well as might be hoped,” the study said.
They tend to have lower grade-point averages, be less likely to be
included on the honour roll, and have a relatively low likelihood of
graduating from high school. “This is true for both boys and girls,”
the study added.
About one-quarter of the girls and one-third of the boys who
entered the Vancouver school system in Grade 8 did not graduate from
high school, the study noted.
“Certainly, other language groups approximate the Tagalog-speaking
children on specific measures. For instance, in some cohorts, those
who speak Punjabi at home have equally low FSA [foundational skills
assessments] scores and grade point averages.
“The ‘drop out’ rates for those who speak Vietnamese at home are
even worse than for Tagalog-speakers. But what is particularly
striking is that Tagalog speakers are at the low end for all of the
measures,” the study said.
The data used by Pratt covers most school districts in the Lower
Mainland, where there is a concentration of Filipino migrants.
Included districts were Vancouver, Surrey, Richmond, New Westminster,
Burnaby, and Coquitlam.
The study also noted that the challenges differ depending on when a
child has immigrated. Those who come in their late teens and have been
enrolled in a university or college in the Philippines find themselves
being sent either back to high school or to adult education learning
centres. “This is a discouraging prospect,” the study said. It noted
that children arriving in their late teens have an “especially awkward
relationship to educational institutions and accreditation in Canada”.
The study cited the case of Melanie (not her real name but one
given by Pratt), who was 18 when her mother sponsored her to Canada.
At that time, she was studying business management at a university in
Manila.
Upon her arrival in Vancouver, Melanie was assessed at Grade 10
level. She required both English and math to finish high school. Her
age put her beyond regular high school and she was enrolled at an
adult learning centre.
She lost interest and instead got a full-time job at McDonald’s.
Her friends are mostly daughters of mothers who have come through the
LCP, and, like Melanie, they have not completed high school.
“Of course, you feel sad about this. And then I said, ‘Back to high
school again. All this paperwork.’ I just lost interest. What’s the
point? I was already working (at McDonalds),” Melanie was quoted in
the study.
Pratt’s study, which she conducted in collaboration with the
Vancouver-based Philippine Women Centre of B.C. and the Filipino-
Canadian Youth Alliance, is due for publication by the end of the
year. But it seems to have already struck a sympathetic chord in two
trustees of the Vancouver school board who belong on opposite sides of
the political spectrum.
COPE school trustee Sharon Gregson told the Straight that the study
underscores the need for more funding for the school system in order
to provide better support systems for the youth.
“Our provincial government is quite able to fund the [2010]
Olympics and its overruns, so why shouldn’t it be able to fund the
schools?” Gregson asked.
Don Lee, NPA school trustee and a former secondary-school teacher,
said that the socioeconomic status of families is an important factor
that can influence the performance of a child in school.
“If the mother or both parents work long hours in low-paying jobs,
they are already tired when they come home and they can’t spend time
with their kids,” Lee told the Straight.
Gregson and Lee agreed on one of the study’s recommendations, which
is the need for the school system to hire more multicultural workers.
At present there is only one multicultural worker dedicated to
overseeing Filipino youths in secondary school.
More than 90 percent of Canada’s domestic caregivers come from the
Philippines. Despite the social costs attributed to the separation of
families, there’s no indication that the Philippines is about to stop
sending mothers to serve foreign families. There are about 800
caregiver schools in the impoverished country, which has become
dependent on the foreign-currency remittances of Filipino overseas
workers for its economic survival.
At least eight million Filipinos, about 10 percent of the country’s
population, work overseas. In 2005, they sent home more than US$10
billion, according to the Central Bank of the Philippines, accounting
for 13.2 percent of the country’s economic growth.
A 2004 Asian Development Bank study estimated that Filipino women
compose 65 percent of Philippine migrants, and the figures are rising.
They have become “dollar mommies” with few personal ties to their
children.
In 2002, Robert Collette, who was then Canada’s ambassador to the
country, told Philippine media that Canadians prefer Filipino nannies.
“They are making Canadian parents very happy because Filipinos are
well-trained, warm, conscious to care and love children,” Collette
said.
May Farrales, executive director of the Philippine Women Centre,
said that the situation of Filipino youths in the school system should
serve as a wake-up call to concerned authorities.
“It’s time for them to come down from their offices and talk with,
listen to, and learn from what the community has to say,” Farrales
told the Straight.
The study also recommended an end to the family separation built
into the structure of the LCP by allowing family immigration from the
start. Under the LCP, a caregiver must work a total of 24 months
within a period of three years before she can apply for
landed-immigrant status, which will allow her to sponsor her family to
Canada.
“This circumstance raises a question of global social justice: why
is it that certain categories of mothers and children systematically
suffer the pain of extended periods of separation? Once the effects on
children’s educational and labour market outcomes become clear, one
must also ask about the long-term rationality of the LCP from the
perspective of Canadian society,” it said.
It has been several years since Albert Lopez dropped out of high
school. He has tried his hand at a number of jobs to help his mother
earn a living for the family.
He still wishes he had more time with her. |